Corojo Vintage 2002 Robusto

RATINGS · 12

• 5★0
• 4★2
• 3★6
• 2★3
• 1★1

RATE THIS CIGAR

COMPOSITION

Wrapper

Nicaragua

Filler

Dominican Republic, Nicaragua

Colour

Colorado

Shape

Robusto

Length

5

Ring gauge

50

REVIEWS · 24

• @ldero712019-03-28 · Stogie’s

  Good draw/burn, woody, creamy.

• @jcimino052018-05-02 · Parking Lot By Work

  So good. So smooth and mellow. Worked out well to let it rest a year.

• @jcimino052017-04-09 · Back Deck

  Toothy, earthy, tight draw but burnt even. Not too harsh or bitter.

• @hartmanlonnie2016-12-20 · Backyard

  very uneven smoking but but okay flavor.

• @hartmanlonnie2016-12-16

  not a keeper

• @mr.crowley.mrc2016-10-11 · Home

  Better than the first review but still a 3 star cigar on a good day.

• @mr.crowley.mrc2016-06-23

  Age/Rest: 39 Days Pre-light: Aromas of chocolate and mint. The cigar is rough to look at, noticeable seams, veins and stems in the wrapper. Consistent colour throughout. The Toast: The foot was easy to toast, even with a gentle breeze. The Draw: The draw was good, a little loose if anything. The cigar creates plumes of smoke on each draw and the foot produced a steady stream of foot smoke. The Burn: The burn was good throughout the smoke a couple of wavy points but self corrected on its own. The cigar went out at about the half way point. The First Third: The cigar starts with a light soft spice that tingles the palate. Hints of a creamy texture from time to time. The cigar has a leathery style that makes it's arrival part way through the first third. The Second Third: Flavours of earth, coffee, the creamy texture builds up as the second third continues. The Final Third: The coffee fades and the creamy texture reduces as the cigar burns through the final third. Overall: Not a bad cigar but not great either. For the price I'd buy them again, aiming for $2 USD or less per stick.

• @solomyngrundy2016-03-02 · Home

  It is better than when I added... But inconsistencies in the wraps will keep me from buying these again.

• @solomyngrundy2016-02-22 · Home

  Much better aged. Smoother taste and smoke. Burned better, too.

• @solomyngrundy2016-02-13 · Home

  after 8 months of being in the humidor, these have gotten much better. Much more smooth, creamy, & a better burn.

• @opusx112016-01-30

  nope.

• @djcoulon2015-11-21 · The Shed

  very average

• @mansuper092015-09-10 · Home

  Started off very spicy and with a loose draw. Mellowed out in the middle and the draw improved. Smooth, good smoke

• @fb_5199898248328212015-08-28 · Garage

  mild but tasty lunch gar.

• @fb_5199898248328212015-08-26

  tasty and med bodied. rebuy.

• @mpsessa2015-08-22 · Backyard

  85/100 medium body toasty finish

• @solomyngrundy2015-07-20 · Home

  Hard to keep lit. Taste was bitter... Nothing else in my humidor is like this... These cigars seem to have inconsistencies.

• @solomyngrundy2015-07-07 · Home

  This one was bitter, and had construction issues. This has been a problem throughout the mazo. I won't bother to buy again, and I'm dropping the rating to a 'meh' rating of 2.5.

• @solomyngrundy2015-06-17 · Home

  this one had burn issues similar to others I've found in this batch... no smoke, even though it's burning. I'm dropping my rating on these, considering the inconsistencies.

• @solomyngrundy2015-05-25 · Home

  Burned much better than the last one... That one must have been a dud.